Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters

Database
Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 11(2)2023 Jan 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2200965

ABSTRACT

Since the spread of the deadly virus SARS-CoV-2 in late 2019, researchers have restlessly sought to unravel how the virus enters the host cells. Some proteins on each side of the interaction between the virus and the host cells are involved as the major contributors to this process: (1) the nano-machine spike protein on behalf of the virus, (2) angiotensin converting enzyme II, the mono-carboxypeptidase and the key component of renin angiotensin system on behalf of the host cell, (3) some host proteases and proteins exploited by SARS-CoV-2. In this review, the complex process of SARS-CoV-2 entrance into the host cells with the contribution of the involved host proteins as well as the sequential conformational changes in the spike protein tending to increase the probability of complexification of the latter with angiotensin converting enzyme II, the receptor of the virus on the host cells, are discussed. Moreover, the release of the catalytic ectodomain of angiotensin converting enzyme II as its soluble form in the extracellular space and its positive or negative impact on the infectivity of the virus are considered.

2.
J Pharm Pharm Sci ; 24: 390-399, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1329250

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with substantial mortality and high morbidity. This study tested the effect of angiotensin II type I receptor blocker, losartan, on SARS-CoV-2 replication and inhibition of the papain-like protease of the virus. METHODS: The dose-dependent inhibitory effect of losartan, in concentrations from 1µM to 100µM as determined by quantitative cell analysis combining fluorescence microscopy, image processing, and cellular measurements (Cellomics analysis) on SARS-CoV-2 replication was investigated in Vero E6 cells. The impact of losartan on deubiquitination and deISGylation of SARS-CoV-2 papain-like protease (PLpro) were also evaluated.  Results: Losartan reduced PLpro cleavage of tetraUbiquitin to diUbiquitin.  It was less effective in inhibiting PLpro's cleavage of ISG15-AMC than Ubiquitin-AMC.  To determine if losartan inhibited SARS-CoV-2 replication, losartan treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infected Vero E6 was examined. Losartan treatment one hour prior to SARS-CoV-2 infection reduced levels of SARS-CoV-2 nuclear protein, an indicator of virus replication, by 80% and treatment one-hour post-infection decreased viral replication by 70%. CONCLUSION: Losartan was not an effective inhibitor of deubiquitinase or deISGylase activity of the PLpro but affected the SARS-CoV-2 replication of Vero E6 cells in vitro.  As losartan has a favorable safety profile and is currently available it has features necessary for efficacious drug repurposing and treatment of COVID-19.


Subject(s)
Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers/pharmacology , Antiviral Agents/pharmacology , Losartan/pharmacology , SARS-CoV-2/drug effects , Animals , Chlorocebus aethiops , Computational Biology , Coronavirus Papain-Like Proteases/antagonists & inhibitors , Coronavirus Papain-Like Proteases/metabolism , Deubiquitinating Enzymes/antagonists & inhibitors , Deubiquitinating Enzymes/metabolism , SARS-CoV-2/metabolism , SARS-CoV-2/physiology , Ubiquitin/metabolism , Vero Cells , Virus Replication/drug effects , COVID-19 Drug Treatment
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL